|
-
Wed Feb 07, 2007, 12:06 PM
#11
Moderator
wowser
bushie have you got a large version of that
i want it badddd
-
Wed Feb 07, 2007, 12:45 PM
#12
Wrigglers
unfortunately, it is not my photo.
and the comet "was" visable because I was standing about 100m from where this shot was taken.
everything is as it looked!
Bushie
.
I used to be indecisive, but now I`m not to sure.
-
Wed Feb 07, 2007, 02:42 PM
#13
Originally Posted by bushie
note: this has not been photoshopped.
Might not have been edited with Photoshop the program but its been stitched and merged and has had a lot of post processing done to it. There are at least 2 possibly 3 seperate exposures in that image.
In laymans terms its been "photoshopped" to the max or else its scanned film from a Xpan and if thats the case it was done with a very very hi rez scanner like a Imagecon or something.
"If it isn't a wild its way too mild ! "
-
Wed Feb 07, 2007, 02:59 PM
#14
-
Wed Feb 07, 2007, 10:52 PM
#15
Wrigglers
sorry guys,
in that case, I stand corrected on the photoshop bit.
in the original email I recieved, it was stated that the photo was geniune and hadn`t been photoshopped although time lapse and a special lens were emlpoyed to capture everything.
but as I said I was there, the comet was there, and that is pretty much how it looked.
regardless, it was an awsome night.
and it is still an awsome photo.
Bushie
.
I used to be indecisive, but now I`m not to sure.
-
Thu Feb 08, 2007, 06:01 AM
#16
Moderator
I still want a copy of it
does someone have a link to a full size version of it?
-
Thu Feb 08, 2007, 11:01 AM
#17
Wrigglers
Bushie
.
I used to be indecisive, but now I`m not to sure.
-
Thu Feb 08, 2007, 11:02 AM
#18
Wrigglers
Bushie
.
I used to be indecisive, but now I`m not to sure.
-
Sat Feb 10, 2007, 10:36 AM
#19
Stunning photo!!!! That must have been an amazing sight to see Bushie!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
| |