|
-
Fri Aug 12, 2005, 09:21 PM
#1
Moderator
to many tanks not enough heaters
ever have this problem?
i was reading an article
http://www.aquarticles.com/articles/...s_Cascade.html
so anyway, i bought a glass drill bit and thought i would give it a crack
the idea is to use a single pump (which i will turn into a canister soon to pump and filter) and pump water into the top tank, then let it cascade down through a series of tanks, then pump it back up again
one 300watt heater should do multiple tanks
i have only hooked up two tanks as of last night but you get the idea
these tanks only house baby B/N but its a good way to keep my fry seperate, and i can keep adding new tanks to the system without to much hasslle
Bills article is cool have a read
-
Fri Aug 12, 2005, 11:14 PM
#2
Founder
The only problem with this would be any disease in one tank, will be spread to the others (not saying there would be any).
I have used the trickle effect once before on 4 x 2ft planted tanks, and it worked a treat (only cold water fish were in one tank - Danios, Whiteclouds, etc)
-
Fri Aug 12, 2005, 11:52 PM
#3
I had a row of ten 60litre plastic storage tubs with lids (the kind you buy from Bunnings or where-ever) plus one tub for filter/pump. All linked together with black poly pipe & fittings like you use for garden irrigation. All on one level. Worked great.
One 300W Tota heater kept all tubs at exactly the same temp.
Fred
-
Sat Aug 13, 2005, 12:43 AM
#4
Moderator
Great little set up there Ryan!
That would save some $$$ for heating, as well as power points!
with this set up Would it be worth setting up an inline uv?
Cheers,
Ben
-
Sat Aug 13, 2005, 01:07 AM
#5
very nice ryan! yeh it should wouk great. i would just make sure there arent any chemicals in your garage and no sprays etc. because the moving water will pick it up.
looks great. i am goin to try it soon with a heater heating the whole system. hope it works
-
Sat Aug 13, 2005, 01:41 AM
#6
Moderator
Yeah its working well
and when i hook it up to a Canister i think UV will be added as well
the tanks can be quickly closed from the system by putting a extension on the thread tank through
just extend it over the tank you wnat to QT and to the next tank in the series
also the tank throughs are better than what bill described as they are threaded and when you have thread you can attach almost anything
-
Sat Aug 20, 2005, 08:52 AM
#7
Are the connections expensive???
-
Sat Aug 20, 2005, 09:06 PM
#8
Moderator
tank through's vary in price due to the diameter
i use 25mm and they cost me 7.00 bucks
-
Tue Aug 23, 2005, 02:29 PM
#9
There are a couple of things that make me abit "iffy" about this setup.
1)Even though you are only using 1 heater it will still need to stay on for as long as 2 seperate ones would thus meaning money is equall to running 2 and your also shortening the life of your heater
2) If you have a power failure the lowest tank may overflow and flood you room, which in turn is dangerous around electricity. And as you have a powerfilter in the lowest tank if you did have a power failure the filter would syphon water back into the lowest tank as no taps are fitted
3)That system looks like it would cost more to run then if you had it on a rack with overflows and a sump as all you need in a sump is a heater (2 in winter) and a pond pump which should break the surface creating oxygen exchange and that means no air driven pumps are needed.
HTH
-
Wed Aug 24, 2005, 07:52 AM
#10
Moderator
1)Even though you are only using 1 heater it will still need to stay on for as long as 2 seperate ones would thus meaning money is equall to running 2 and your also shortening the life of your heater
not really,
its a 300watt heater and it heats a 2ft tank very well, in fact it heats two 2ft tanks with little to no extra "on" time from what i can see over the past few days, in fact it is now heating three tanks and i can still see no comparable difference in "on" Time
just remember that its not necesarily the on time that counts, its how effective it heats the water while on
2) If you have a power failure the lowest tank may overflow and flood you room, which in turn is dangerous around electricity. And as you have a powerfilter in the lowest tank if you did have a power failure the filter would syphon water back into the lowest tank as no taps are fitted
i measured at what depth i need the lowest tank so it can handle any poweroutage
no water syphons back as the outlet from poly attched to the powerhead is only just below the waterline
3)That system looks like it would cost more to run then if you had it on a rack with overflows and a sump as all you need in a sump is a heater (2 in winter) and a pond pump which should break the surface creating oxygen exchange and that means no air driven pumps are needed.
why would this 162 lt system use more heaters than a sump system?
Pond pumps are expensive to run and ineffective in power, the gas exchange by this sytem will destroy a pond pump "breaking the surface"
and it is only used to hold Bristle nose, why bother?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
| |