|
-
Sat Aug 30, 2008, 12:29 PM
#1
San Merah Discus
-
Sat Aug 30, 2008, 12:56 PM
#2
Medium Discus
Hi TW, they look great and seems to be very healthy too. Your royal blue is looking gorgeous. I guess you have the royal blue for 6 months now so with your good food, etc, i assume thats why it's color is more intense than your new wild blue, in time i am sure it's color will also be just as intense.
It is hard to take picture from QT tank. Water in QT tank is not as crystal clear compare to display tank. I thought my pictures also look pretty dirty water too. Keep up with the wilds they look sensational together.
-
Sun Aug 31, 2008, 12:12 AM
#3
San Merah Discus
Hi Ivo - they are very healthy. They haven't given me a moments worry. Usually new discus won't eat from the first day, or there is something (shy, etc). But these guys ate straight away and settled straight in.
As to the food for the wild royal blue in display, I don't "colour feed" in that tank cause I worry that it would turn my albino or blue diamond a funny colour. So he only eats home made beef heart (Merilyn's recipe) and spirulina brine shrimp. I keep meaning to ask the experts about whether naturose and it's effects on blue diamond's colour, as I have some of the powder & flakes, but don't use them for my discus.
QT's water is changed daily, so my water should be clean - but the exterior wall of the tank isn't wiped down often & this doesn't help with pics.
Thanks for the nice comments ivo.
Previously known as "Tankwatcher"
-
Sun Aug 31, 2008, 01:13 AM
#4
lucky you - they look beautiful
Love the Royal Blue - the blue stands out.
Mind i love the brown as well..
-
Sun Aug 31, 2008, 05:27 AM
#5
tw
they are beautiful wilds. congrats. i wholeheartedly suport your idea of just having a wild tank - you will love it.
tc
-
Sun Aug 31, 2008, 02:44 PM
#6
Eternal Moderator
Absolutely gorgeous !!!!!!!!
Wild caught browns were the very first discus I ever owned, and I still have a soft spot for them.
From what I can see, your wild blue and wild royal blue are the same strain.
When the blues were first captured and imported, they were a huge hit, as you can imagine. All we had been able to get up till then was a wild brown with just a few stripes of blue on the face and dorsal and anal fin. Then along came a fish with blue on the body as well so it was immediately named the Blue Discus.
Not long after, blue fish with more blue as well as red striations on the body began to appear, and they were given the grand name of Royal Blue.
The difference is really only the amount of blue on the body. :P
-
Sun Aug 31, 2008, 10:14 PM
#7
San Merah Discus
Thanks everyone for the nice compliments.
Merrilyn - as ever you are a great source of information.
Do you think my other discus is not really a "Wild Royal Blue" after all? Simply a beautiful "Wild Blue" but with much more vibrant colouring than my recent acquisition? There's not much difference in the "amount" of blue & red on the two. The difference is in the vibrancy of the colour.
Previously known as "Tankwatcher"
-
Mon Sep 01, 2008, 12:24 PM
#8
Thems sum NICE NICE fishy's Ms TW
"If it isn't a wild its way too mild ! "
-
Mon Sep 01, 2008, 01:04 PM
#9
Eternal Moderator
I think they're both Wild Royal Blue. :P
-
Mon Sep 01, 2008, 10:04 PM
#10
San Merah Discus
Thanks taksan & Merrilyn.
That's good news. I will now call them both by that name. I looked especially closely at the WRB I have owned the longest last night and I can see even in the middle of his body the "shadow" or "hint" of the blue & red coming through (on one side of his body only). It is very faint, but it is there. I don't think it was there to begin with, or if it was, I didn't notice it before.
It seems like his colour is spreading - is that possible or did I just not see it before.
Previously known as "Tankwatcher"
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
| |