|
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 06:32 AM
#1
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 06:46 AM
#2
Eternal Moderator
Looking forward to the results of the test Taksan.
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 08:56 AM
#3
Founder
Ditto to that.
Given the price differences it would be good to see if one is superior to the other.
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 12:20 PM
#4
Looks good so far!
By the looks of it the Fluval may have the upper hand at the moment.
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 12:43 PM
#5
Moderator
-
Wed May 03, 2006, 12:56 PM
#6
Founder
Originally Posted by fw05racer
Looks good so far!
By the looks of it the Fluval may have the upper hand at the moment.
I wouldnt be too sure on that, personally I think the configuration of the Pro III is far superior, however the FX5 does have a lot of grunt.
-
Thu May 04, 2006, 08:44 AM
#7
Originally Posted by Proteus
Originally Posted by fw05racer
Looks good so far!
By the looks of it the Fluval may have the upper hand at the moment.
I wouldnt be too sure on that, personally I think the configuration of the Pro III is far superior, however the FX5 does have a lot of grunt.
Well just a quick opinion on the whole price vs performance character of the filters.
Not a fan of the bio sponges though.......
Just one more question, how come the Pro 3 ships with the old style Eheim spraybars and intakes? Most of the Pro 1 and Pro 2 seem to have the new light grey installation sets.
-
Thu May 04, 2006, 10:50 AM
#8
Oh well better be on the look out for them then.
I got the special spray bar kit on a 2224 as well. Really makes moving the filter to different tanks easier so you can adjust the height and length.
-
Thu May 04, 2006, 11:38 PM
#9
Cant wait to see the results
-
Thu May 04, 2006, 11:40 PM
#10
great timing on this one! looking into getting a cannister filter so I will wait until results are posted...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
| |